Pipeline architecture
Intake normalization (email, SFTP, scanner, API) → layout detection → OCR with vision-language fallback for degraded scans → schema-constrained generation → deterministic validators → reconciliation → write-back.
We do not sell a platform and we do not sell seats. Each engagement is scoped from a measured flow, and only the service lines that move the constraint get funded. Everything below is delivered by senior engineers who have run production systems.
Before anything is built, we establish what the process actually does. We extract event logs from the systems that already timestamp your work — ERP audit tables, ticketing history, mail server logs, MES records, door badges, telematics — and reconstruct the real directed graph of activities, including the paths nobody designed.
The output is not a slide deck. It is a quantified model: activity frequencies, cycle time distributions, queue time between handoffs, rework loop detection, resource contention, and conformance gaps against the process as it was intended.
A language model on its own is not an automation. Production workflows need durable state, exactly-once side effects, bounded retries, compensation when a downstream system rejects a write, and a queue that a human can inspect at 2 a.m.
We separate the two concerns deliberately: the model performs interpretation and classification, the orchestration engine guarantees execution. That separation is why our deployments survive an ERP maintenance window instead of silently dropping transactions.
Unstructured paper is where most enterprise throughput is lost. We convert it into typed, validated, reconciled records with an auditable confidence score on every single field.
Intake normalization (email, SFTP, scanner, API) → layout detection → OCR with vision-language fallback for degraded scans → schema-constrained generation → deterministic validators → reconciliation → write-back.
Per-field confidence calibration against a labelled holdout set from your own archive. We report precision, recall and straight-through rate per document class, and we set thresholds from your cost of error, not from a vendor default.
Exceptions arrive in a review queue that is pre-filled and source-linked: the reviewer sees the extracted value next to the highlighted region of the original page, corrects it in one action, and the correction feeds the evaluation set.
Template-based capture breaks when a supplier changes layout, which happens constantly. Modern vision-language extraction reads semantically — it finds the total because it understands what a total is, not because the value sits at fixed coordinates.
We keep the deterministic parts deterministic: arithmetic checks, tax validation, vendor master lookups and tolerance rules are code, not prompts. The model handles perception; verified logic handles correctness.
The result is a pipeline that absorbs new document variants without a configuration project, while still refusing to post anything it cannot verify.
Your ERP stays your ERP. We build a thin, well-tested integration layer around the systems you already depend on, because ripping out a system of record to enable an AI project is how AI projects die.
We have worked against modern REST tenants and against twenty-year-old installations with no documented API. Both are tractable — the second simply requires more care around transaction boundaries and rate limits.
When a phase runs remotely, these are the accesses we typically request. They are scoped, logged and revoked at engagement close, and we work with whatever your security team can actually approve.
Where remote access cannot be granted — air-gapped plants, classified environments, regulated data residency — the work is performed entirely on-site with your infrastructure.
Assistants grounded in your own institutional knowledge, with explicit permissions on anything that changes state. Built for staff who are accountable for the answer.
Hybrid retrieval combining lexical search with dense vectors, reranking, and metadata filters on effective date, revision, jurisdiction and entitlement. Every answer cites the document and section it came from, so a specialist can verify it in seconds.
We index what your business actually runs on: standards and codes, historical quotes, engineering specifications, SOPs, warranty terms, contract libraries, resolved support tickets and maintenance histories.
Agents that read are low risk. Agents that write require engineering discipline: allow-listed tools, typed parameters, value ceilings, mandatory human confirmation on irreversible actions, and a complete decision log for every invocation.
We define the blast radius before we grant a capability. An agent that can issue a credit note has a dollar limit and a named approver; an agent that can email a customer has a reviewed template set.
Classifies inbound tickets, retrieves the resolution history of similar cases, drafts a grounded reply and escalates anything outside its competence envelope with a written rationale.
Reads a tender package, extracts the scope and exclusions, matches line items against your historical unit costs, and flags clauses that deviate from your standard risk position.
Correlates a symptom description with equipment history, manuals and prior work orders, then proposes a diagnostic sequence and the parts likely required.
Most failed AI initiatives are actually failed data initiatives. If the process has no reliable event stream, no model can be trusted and no gain can be proven. We build the minimum viable foundation — not a multi-year warehouse programme.
Where the constraint is a choice rather than a handoff, the right tool is often mathematical optimization rather than a language model — and knowing which is which is part of what you hire us for.
Applied to every engagement, not sold as an add-on. An automated decision you cannot explain to an auditor is a liability, however accurate it is.
Every automated decision stores its inputs, the model and prompt version, the confidence scores and the rule path taken. Reconstructible months later, on demand.
Personal information is redacted or tokenized before inference wherever the task does not require it. Retention windows are configured per data class.
Cloud regions in your own jurisdiction, your own tenant, or fully self-hosted inference on your hardware with open-weight models when data cannot leave the building.
GDPR and the EU AI Act, PIPEDA and provincial privacy law in Canada, US state privacy regimes, plus sector requirements such as SOC 2 evidence support and ISO 9001 process documentation.
Our method is sector-agnostic because constraints are structural. What changes is the vocabulary, the systems and the regulatory envelope — not the physics of a queue.
Scheduling under changeover cost, quality inspection triage, MES-to-ERP reconciliation, predictive maintenance intake, supplier quality correspondence.
Demand forecasting, replenishment policy, carrier document processing, exception handling on shipments, dock scheduling, claims recovery.
Accounts payable and receivable automation, engagement intake, document assembly, time capture from activity data, compliance checklists.
Tender analysis, submittal review, RFI triage, change-order tracking, site report digitization, progress claim assembly.
Referral and requisition intake, prior authorization packaging, billing code validation, denial management, scheduling optimization.
Claims first-notice triage, underwriting document review, KYC evidence assembly, reconciliation breaks, regulatory reporting preparation.
Tier-one support deflection, catalogue enrichment, returns disposition, marketplace dispute handling, fraud review queues.
Dispatch optimization, proof-of-delivery capture, driver document compliance, work order enrichment, warranty claim validation.
Application and permit intake, grant reporting, case file summarization, records requests, eligibility pre-screening with full auditability.
On-site is our default, particularly for discovery — you cannot measure a flow you have not watched. Engineering and industrialization phases are frequently delivered remotely once we hold the necessary system access, with on-site checkpoints at each rollout gate. Where remote access cannot be granted, the entire mandate runs on-site. We define the split, the required access rights and the revocation date in the statement of work.
For discovery: read-only access to the event and audit tables of the systems carrying the process, plus exports of relevant mailboxes or queues. For build: a sandbox or staging environment, scoped API credentials, and a named SSO account with least-privilege roles. We never ask for shared administrator credentials, we operate through your VPN or zero-trust broker, and all access is logged on your side and revoked at close.
That is a decision for you, not an outcome we engineer toward. What we consistently remove is transcription, chasing, re-keying and exception triage — work that nobody was hired to enjoy. In most engagements headcount is redeployed onto analysis, customer relationships and the exception cases that genuinely require judgment. We say this plainly because adoption fails when the people operating the process believe the project is aimed at them.
No. Every operational dataset we have encountered was messy, and the discovery phase exists partly to quantify how messy. If the data foundation is genuinely insufficient to support the intervention, we will tell you that in the diagnostic report and scope the foundation work separately rather than building on sand.
You do. Deliverables include source code in your repository, infrastructure definitions, runbooks and evaluation datasets. We deliberately avoid proprietary lock-in: you must be able to replace us without losing the solution, and we consider that a design constraint rather than a concession.
The flow audit is a fixed-fee, fixed-scope engagement with a defined deliverable set. Build phases are quoted per milestone against the acceptance criteria agreed at the end of discovery. Where the baseline is measurable and the client prefers it, we will structure part of the fee against verified throughput improvement.
Then the report says so. A meaningful share of the constraints we find are resolved by a database index, a corrected approval threshold, a removed redundant sign-off or a fixed integration — and we will recommend the cheap fix over the interesting one. Our credibility depends on it.
Tell us where the work piles up. We will tell you whether it is measurable, addressable, and worth the investment.